|
Technical Information (MGB 12)
British Automotive's Big-Bore Conversion
1924cc
These forged alloy pistons (83mm) are custom
manufactured by J.E. Pistons and are of a flat top configuration ready for
piston dish (cc) machining and require a piston skirt to bore clearance of
.002". NOTE: these
pistons are designed for use with any conrod configuration.
The following is applicable to 5 main
bearing engines only:
It is quite possible that your cyl/block has
original factory cylinder liners installed (under no circumstances rebore these
liners). These liners were installed to rectify cyl/block casting
imperfections. Should this be the case, it will not be possible to bore the
cyl/block to accept 83mm pistons, however, it is possible to use 83.5mm pistons
P/N MGB1948cc (use 83mm boring procedure below), or alternatively, resleeve the
cyl/block and bore to 010"/020"/030"/040" or 060", in preference, use piston
P/N MGB1868cc (060"). If your cyl/block does not have liners installed, then
careful boring of the cylinders should be undertaken to within .005" of the
finished bore size. At this dimension, it can be determined whether or not the
cyl/bore can be successfully honed to give the desired finish (please note,
always start at #4 cyl/bore as this seems to be the troublesome area). In the
event that your cyl/block cannot be successfully rebored to accommodate these
pistons, it is unlikely that you will be successful in going to the next
available bore size (83.5mm). Either proceed with liner installation and rebore
or provide another cyl/block and start all over again!
Advantages of British Automotive's 83mm Pistons
- No cyl/block redecking required to
facilitate piston compression height.
- No cyl/head modifications required for
GCR work.
- After initial rebore, cyl/bore can be
readily rebored to oversize (83.5mm).
- Pistons can be used with any type of
conrod.
- No cyl/head gasket overhang into
cyl/bore.
- Piston crown design can accommodate
machining for the desired GCR.
While there are numerous big-bore
modification kits available, there are usually some disadvantages associated
with their fitment, some of which are listed below:
- Pistons can only be used with certain
conrods.
- Piston crown thickness does not allow for
any piston dish cc machining.
- Excessive redecking of cyl/block required
due to the shorter piston compression height.
- To achieve the correct GCR, the cyl/head
needs to be reworked to the correct capacity.
Listed below are the necessary clearance
volume(s) (CV) required for a particular engine size to achieve the recommended
9:1 GCR:
Bore Size |
Engine Capacity |
CV required |
Actual GCR |
Std |
1800cc |
56.5cc |
8.96:1 |
+010" |
1812cc |
56.5cc |
9.02:1 |
+020" |
1822cc |
57.0cc |
8.99:1 |
+030" |
1834cc |
57.5cc |
8.97:1 |
+040" |
1844cc |
58.0cc |
8.95:1 |
+060" |
1868cc |
58.5cc |
8.98:1 |
83mm |
1924cc |
60.0cc |
9.02:1 |
83.5mm |
1948cc |
61.0cc |
8.98:1 |
Effective Compression Ratio (ECR)
This is more important than GCR. For ECR
relates directly to the actual inlet valve closing (IVC) position relative to
top dead center (TDC) and expressed as after bottom dead center (ABDC). To find
this ECR, you must first install a valve timing degree wheel to determine
exactly when IVC occurs. For convenient measuring purposes, I prefer to use
.001" before actual IVC (under actual running conditions, this IVC position
will be slightly different due to valvetrain component flexibility).
Calculating the ECR can be done by: 1 - plotting a graph of piston movement to
crankshaft angle, 2 - by applying the appropriate trigonometrically formula, or
3 - the use of a PC program covering this subject. Thanks to Dimitri Elgin of
Elgin Racing Cams, Redwood City, Ca., for the following program information
which is applicable to British Automotive's 1924cc Big-Bore MGB engine:
|
Intake Closes |
Swept |
ECR |
ECR |
|
ABDC |
Vol. |
9:1 GCR |
10:1 GCR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
395.108 |
7.562 |
8.383 |
1 |
58
|
392.09 |
7.512 |
8.326 |
|
59
|
389.024 |
7.461 |
8.269 |
|
60
|
385.911 |
7.409 |
8.211 |
|
61
|
382.751 |
7.357 |
8.152 |
|
62
|
379.546 |
7.304 |
8.092 |
|
63
|
376.294 |
7.25 |
8.031 |
|
64
|
372.998 |
7.195 |
7.969 |
|
65
|
369.658 |
7.14 |
7.907 |
|
66
|
366.273 |
7.083 |
7.844 |
|
67
|
362.845 |
7.026 |
7.78 |
|
68
|
359.375 |
6.969 |
7.715 |
|
69
|
355.863 |
6.91 |
7.649 |
|
70
|
352.309 |
6.851 |
7.583 |
2 |
71
|
348.715 |
6.792 |
7.516 |
|
72
|
345.081 |
6.731 |
7.448 |
ECR Applications
- 6.0:1 ECR - low horsepower engine
- 6.5:1 ECR - fair engine
- 7.0:1 ECR - street gas 92 octane
- 7.5:1 ECR - good tuning required, street gas 92 octane
- Over 7.5:1 ECR - requires 104 octane boost
- Over 8.0:1 ECR - requires racing gas
From the above information, it is easy
to understand that we can optimize the resulting ECR by establishing earlier
IVC. A comparison between 1 and 2 clearly
shows these optimum and non-optimum aspects of IVC.
So, if you are contemplating rebuilding
your engine or already in the engine rebuilding process, you may want to review
your camshaft choice. My recommendations are as follows: for street,
performance street and rallying - use 9:1 GCR, choose a camshaft with around
220-225 duration, and with an IVC of between 35-37 deg. ABDC (both measured at
.050" lifter rise). This should put IVC at approximately 60 deg. ABDC (+ or - 3
deg.) when measured at the intake valve. This puts us in the area of 7.0-7.5:1
ECR.
CAMSHAFT CHOICE
Increasing the air & fuel
consumption results in more horsepower. There are several ways to accomplish
this, one being the installation of a "hotter" camshaft. There is always a
tendency to think "bigger is better" when choosing a replacement camshaft,
however this can be counter-productive because it upsets the balance between
the camshaft's breathing characteristics and the actual breathing requirements
of the engine at certain engine Rpms.
Let's take a look at two individual
dynamometer tests that were performed "some time ago" on British Automotive's
1924cc engines (you will see this "adage" used several times during your browse
through the web site's technical information portion). What we are going to
show you is that you should always use a camshaft suitable for your particular
engine operating RPM range, and by doing so you will see how different
combinations of carbs, manifolds and GCR's can influence maximum BHP and TORQUE
results.
The following dyno test (March 1991) was
conducted only up to 4500 RPM; unfortunately, this was due to a communication
problem with the dyno shop. I have copied the original dyno test results and
estimated (based upon known facts) the final BHP & TORQUE figures.
Test 1
- WEBER 45DCOE Carb (long intake runner
manifold & exhaust header)
- Camshaft duration 222 deg. @ .050" cam
lobe lift, GCR 9:1
RPM |
BHP |
TORQUE lb./ft |
3000 |
76.5 |
133.9 |
3500 |
91.1 |
136.75 |
4000 |
102.1 |
133.9 |
4500 |
109.1 |
127.2 |
5000 |
112.2 est.120.1 est. |
|
5500 |
112.2 est.107.3 est. |
|
Test 2
- MIKUNI 44PHH Carb (short intake
runner manifold & exhaust header)
- Camshaft duration 235 deg. @ .050"
cam lobe lift, GCR 10:1.
- The cylinder head was identical to the one used
in the above test.
RPM |
BHP |
TORQUE lb./ft |
3000 |
70.7 |
123.7 |
3500 |
86.2 |
129.3 |
4000 |
99.7 |
131 |
4500 |
110.3 |
128.7 |
5000 |
118.8 |
124.8 |
5500 |
124.9 |
119.2 |
6000 |
128.6 |
112.6 |
6500 |
126.9 |
102.5 |
Test 3
- MIKUNI 44PHH Carb (short intake
runner manifold & exhaust header)
- Camshaft duration 222 deg. @ .050"
cam lobe lift, GCR 9:1.
- The cylinder head was identical to the used in
the previous tests.
RPM |
BHP |
TORQUE lb./ft |
3000 |
63.9 |
120.7 |
3500 |
83.4 |
125.2 |
4000 |
95.8 |
125.7 |
4500 |
105.9 |
123.5 |
5000 |
110.7 |
116.2 |
5500 |
113.5 |
108.4 |
6000 |
111.7 |
97.8 |
Let's make comparison checks and compare
dyno results from Test 1 and Test 2. It can be seen that the WEBER 45DCOE BHP
& TORQUE readings were superior until we reached 4500 RPM. From here the
MIKUNI 45PHH set-up showed worthwhile gains in both BHP & TORQUE over that
of the WEBER 45DCOE.
|